323 Fox Run Road, Walhalla, SC 29691
Other
IDR Rp519,516,559
USD $29,000
Published on: 16 Feb 2026
Last updated on: 04 Jun 2026
Property ID: 110105764582
Translate to English
LAND - Walhalla, SC
323 Fox Run Road, Walhalla, SC 29691
Come take a look at a very buildable lot in Walhalla close to the national parks and lake Keowee and Lake Hartwell and ready for development! This is a great location and no HOA fees!
Property Details
Basic Info
Basic Info
Property Type
Other
Listing Status
Active
Land Size
2,104.37 m2
County
Oconee
Parcel ID
500-04-01-089
Provider
Western Upstate Association of REALTORS®
Subdivision
Fox Run Estates
Brokerage Office Name
JW MARTIN REAL ESTATE
Brokerage Office Phone
(864) 653-0173
Neighbourhoods
Fox Run Estates
Address
323 Fox Run Road, Walhalla, SC 29691
Nearby Schools
| Type | School name | District name |
|---|---|---|
| High | Walhalla High | Not available |
| Elementary | Walhalla Elem | Not available |
| Middle | Walhalla Middle | Not available |
| Juniorhigh | Walhalla Middle | Not available |
Contact Agent
Justin Smith
Contact Agent
Contact Agent
Email enquiry to JW Martin Real Estate
Justin Smith
1103 Tiger Blvd , Clemson, SC 29631
What's your enquiry about?
By clicking "Submit", you accept our Privacy Policy and acknowledge that as the agent for this property is located overseas, your information may not be handled in accordance with the privacy laws applicable to this website.
Property ID: 110105764582
Original Property ID: 3yd-WUARSC-20297388Data provided by Western Upstate Association of REALTORS®, MLS #: 20297388
* THIS SERVICE MAY CONTAIN TRANSLATIONS POWERED BY GOOGLE. GOOGLE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES RELATED TO THE TRANSLATIONS, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING ANY WARRANTIES OF ACCURACY, RELIABILITY, AND ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.
Copyright © 2026 Western Upstate Association of REALTORS®. All rights reserved. All information provided by the listing agent/broker is deemed reliable but is not guaranteed and should be independently verified.